California’s poverty problem is mainly a cost-of-living problem, not simply a “people don’t work” problem.

California is a very wealthy state, yet it has the nation’s highest cost-of-living-adjusted poverty rate because basic needs, especially housing, are so expensive relative to what many people earn.

A recent Berkeley analysis says plainly that high costs and unequal income growth have made California unusually unaffordable, even compared with places that have similar median incomes.

The biggest causes are these:

1. Housing costs are too high.

This is the largest driver. California households are unusually burdened by rent and mortgage costs.

PPIC reported this month that California has the highest share of homeowners spending more than half their income on housing costs and the third-highest share of renters doing the same, showing that the housing shortage is still severe. (Public Policy Institute of California)

2. Many jobs do not pay enough to match California prices.

Even though wages are higher than in much of the country, many workers still cannot meet basic costs.

PPIC says 36% of California workers earn low wages, defined as less than $21 an hour, and nearly 10% of workers are poor under the California Poverty Measure.

The state minimum wage is $16.90 an hour as of January 1, 2026, which helps, but for many families that is still not enough in high-cost regions. (Public Policy Institute of California)

3. Poverty exists even among people who work.

This is important because it disproves the idea that poverty is mostly caused by joblessness.

PPIC found that 1.5 million working Californians ages 25–64 were living in poverty in 2023, and about half of poor workers were employed full time.

That points to a mismatch between earnings and expenses, not just lack of effort. (Public Policy Institute of California)

4. Child care is too expensive.

Child care acts like a poverty trap: it drains income and also keeps some parents, especially single parents, from working more hours or taking better jobs.

Kidsdata reports that center-based infant care in California consumed about 47% of annual income for single parents and 15% for married couples, far above the federal affordability benchmark of 7%. (kidsdata.org)

5. Poverty rises when public supports shrink.

California poverty worsened after pandemic-era federal relief ended. PPIC says the California poverty rate rose from 15.2% in 2022 to 16.9% in 2023, and specifically links the increase to the expiration of expanded supports like the Child Tax Credit, stimulus payments, unemployment support, and food assistance expansions. (Public Policy Institute of California)

6. Poverty falls unevenly across groups and regions.

Children, renters, lower-wage workers, and some racial and ethnic groups are hit harder.

PPIC found especially high poverty among service and agricultural workers, and reported that Latino workers are overrepresented among workers in poverty.

Single working parents also face especially high poverty rates. (Public Policy Institute of California)

How to reduce poverty in California:

Build much more housing.

This is the single most important long-term fix. California needs more homes, especially lower-cost and middle-income housing near jobs and transit.

Faster approvals, more infill housing, denser zoning in high-opportunity areas, more apartments, ADUs [Accessory Dwelling Units], and reduced barriers to construction would do more to lower poverty than almost any other structural reform because they attack the state’s biggest cost burden.

PPIC’s latest housing analysis says supply has improved but is still far from enough to erase the shortage. (Public Policy Institute of California)

Raise take-home income for low- and moderate-income workers.

That means not only wages, but also stronger tax credits such as the CalEITC [California Earned Income Tax Credit], Young Child Tax Credit, and similar refundable credits.

PPIC shows safety-net programs and tax credits already keep millions out of poverty; without them, about 2.6 million more Californians would have been poor in 2023. (Public Policy Institute of California)

Make child care far cheaper and more available.

Expanding subsidies, pre-K [pre-kindergarten], and provider capacity would both reduce family expenses and increase parents’ ability to work full time.

PPIC notes that policies around child care, health, and training can directly increase people’s ability to work and improve earnings. (Public Policy Institute of California)

Improve job quality, not just job quantity.

California needs more pathways from low-wage service work into stable middle-income jobs through community college programs, apprenticeships, skills training, and sector-based hiring in health care, construction, logistics, public infrastructure, and clean energy.

PPIC’s worker data show wages differ sharply by education, region, and occupation, so career mobility matters. (Public Policy Institute of California)

Protect and simplify the safety net.

Food assistance, school meals, health coverage, and cash or tax supports reduce poverty measurably.

PPIC found CalFresh alone kept 856,000 Californians out of poverty in 2023.

When benefits are hard to access, eligible families lose help they need. (Public Policy Institute of California)

Target homelessness and extreme rent burden more aggressively.

For the poorest Californians, poverty and homelessness are tightly connected.

Housing vouchers, shallow rental subsidies, supportive housing, and eviction prevention are more effective than waiting until families are already on the street.

California’s own budget continues to devote large sums to housing and homelessness programs, though some areas were also reduced in the 2024–25 spending plan, which shows how funding instability can weaken progress. (Legislative Analyst’s Office)

My bottom line:

California poverty is caused by a combination of high housing costs, insufficient earnings, expensive child care, and gaps in public support.

If the state wants to reduce poverty seriously, the most effective formula is:

more housing + higher take-home income + cheaper child care + stronger safety-net access.

Without fixing housing, California will keep producing poverty even when employment is high.